The discovery of America
by the Chinese in 1421 is a big lie!
The author changed a map to fit his theory!
By Manuel Luciano da Silva, Medical Doctor

When I was a teenager and went to the public fairs on 9th and 23rd  of each month,  in my hometown of Vale de Cambra,  Continental  Portugal, one of things that impressed me the most were Chinese men selling neckties. They exhibited a variety of  colorful  ties on a bar at the level of the belly button, and announced loudly  their price. ”It is a bargain, each for fifty escudos”. And then they sold each tie for five escudos!  This price exaggeration left a mark in the people of my home town to the point that every time we heard  an exorbitance  we classified it  as a “Chinese bargain”! 

Now the excessive publicity for the book that says that the Chinese discovered America  many years  before the Europeans, reminds me of the  Chinese  men selling neckties in my hometown in Portugal!…

I have here in my house a copy of the video when Mr. Gavin Menzies made his presentation at the British Historical Society in London, England,  concerning “his” discovery of America  and the entire world by the Chinese, in 1421.   His lecture is an authentic rubbish. It has no heads and no tails. He does not present any  Chinese coeval documentation, or  any maps, nor any confirmatory documents! The entire presentation is pure fantasy, it is a nightmare!

What amazes me most is the organized machinery of publicity  that was started in England and it is now getting generalized in the United States of America  and even to other countries with translations of the book in several languages. The title of the book is:  “1421- The Year China discovered America” by Gavin Menzies . This book costs $27 dollars. It is foreseen that many Americans will buy this book as a matter of curiosity.  I am not going to spend one cent on it!

A good friend of mine received a copy of this book, as a gift from his son, and my friend insisted that I should see the book, to confirm my bad impressions of the theory of Chinese being the early discoverers of America. So I did.  This way I could examine the book before I could  give my final diagnosis  and even  write my  final autopsy report!…

Examining the book “1421- The Year the Chinese discovered America”, the first thing  I noticed,  and  verified was that the author Gavin Menzies changed a map to fit his theory of the Chinese being the  first discoverers of America!  That is a No, No.  That  is a big  Boo, Boo!  A honest investigator should never change an original document or map! That is a crime!

Nautical Chart of 1424

Mr. Gavin Menzies confesses, on the  introduction of his book starting on page three,  that it was the  Nautical Chart of 1424 that gave him the inspiration to conceive his theory that the Chinese discovered America in 1421.

He states that this Nautical Chart of 1424, that exists in the remarkable collection of early maps and charts at the James Ford Bell Library at the University of Minnesota, was signed by Zuane Pizzigano, on August 22, 1424. He further considers, with conviction, that this Nautical Chart of 1424 is an extraordinary cartographic achievement for that era, because of the accuracy of the coastline of Europe and Africa and also of the known archipelagos  of Azores, Madeira and Canary islands. But what really dominated his attention were the four most western islands, two of which are painted in red and the other two painted  in blue. He emphasizes that “the date of this map, its provenance and authenticity are unimpeachable”.

He analyzes the names of these four islands: Satanazes, Antilia, Saya and Ymana and agrees that they  are all Portuguese names!  He concurs that the name Antilia is Portuguese: ‘anti’  meaning ‘on the opposite side of’,  plus ‘ilha’ equal to ‘island’.  So far so good.  But  then, suddenly,  he is fooled, hypnotized by the word Antilia. And he writes: “After several months of examining  charts and documents in map rooms and archives I became convinced that Antilia and Satanazes were actually the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe”. With this statement, Mr. Gavin Menzies committed historical suicide! To fit his statement  he changed the positions of the islands on the Nautical Chart of 1424!

I am really amazed  that Mr. Gavin Menzies,  being a retired captain of a British submarine,  did not see, immediately,  that those  four islands on the Nautical Chart of 1424 are on the same north latitudes as the southern part of England – his home country!— and  including  also the continental European coastlines all the way down to Gibraltar! These four islands are encompassed within the latitudes between 35.5 and 47 degrees north  measured on the Nautical Chart of 1424!  The latitudes of the islands of Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe in the Caribbean have a latitude of 18 degrees north. There is a difference of more than 27 degrees of latitude which is equivalent to more than 1,750 miles of distance! How could a British captain  make such huge discrepancy? I believe Mr. Gavin Menzies had his Chinese theory preconceived!

But he makes a much bigger blunder trying to prove his theory that the islands of Antilia and Satanazes are respectively Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe.  Those islands are drawn on the Nautical Chart of 1424, practically in a vertical position, but Mr. Menzies to fit his preconceived theory simply changes the Nautical Chart and puts these islands in an horizontal position, and even upside-down, to match the geographic characteristics of the islands of Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe. Unbelievable!  Too bad! The study of the discovery of Americas are in  need of honest investigation not  more confusion, which only serves individual capricious wishes! 

Analyzing the facts.

First let us look at the lines of latitude on the Nautical Chart of 1424.

 

 

 

On this photo we can easily see that the four islands: Saya, Satanazes, Ymana and Antilia are within 47 degrees and 35.5 degrees latitudes north. Please relate them to Europe: England, France, Spain, Portugal and Africa.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now let us compare all the latitudes of the  north Atlantic with the latitudes in the Caribbean Sea in relation to  the latitudes of  Europe and Africa.

Please note that the only American islands  that are opposite to continental Europe are Newfoundland and Nova Scotia.

 

 

 

Now let us observe the angles of inclination of both the Island of Satanazes and the island of Antilia. It is  very easy for us to verify that they are both drawn on the Nautical Chart practically in a vertical position. 

I am sure by now you can see the geographic similarity of the islands of Satanazes with Newfoundland, and the island of Antilia with the Nova Scotia, without making  much effort.  

 

 

 

 

Now let us go all the way down to the Caribbean and see what Mr. Gavin did with Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe.

Please note that Puerto Rico  is 18 degrees latitude north and Guadeloupe is at 17 degrees latitude north. Quite a difference between 35.5 and 47 degrees of latitude north as on the Nautical Chart of 1424. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now let us see what Mr. Gavin Menzies did to falsified  the  island of Antilia  to match the island of Puerto Rico. 

The island of Antilia  is practically in a  vertical position  on the Nautical Chart, but Menzies simply placed it on horizontal  position. How about that?!  Look at the insert on the bottom of this photo to see already Antilia  in a  horizontal  position!  It was Menzies that made this insert at the bottom of the Nautical Chart. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now let us  take a look at page 253 of Menzies’ book and see what comparative drawing  he made.  He compared Antilia with Puerto Rico. This is indeed an unfortunate comparison!

A historian should NEVER alter the position of an island to fit his theory! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On page 241, Menzies presents a map of Puerto Rico together  with group of the Lesser Antilles islands, and points out his selection of Puerto Rico for the island of Antilia,  and Guadeloupe for the island of Satanazes. 

Puerto Rico and Guadeloupe are 300 miles apart. Puerto Rico is at 18 degrees latitude north, and Guadeloupe is at 17 degrees latitude north . Neither of these two islands have any  geographic comparison  whatsoever with the islands of Antilia and Satanazes in their original drawing on the Nautical Chart of 1424! 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, see (above) the  further mess Menzies  did  by comparing  the island of Satanazes with  the island of Guadeloupe.  This is even more catastrophic!  He  even has the island of Satanazes upside-down!!! from the original position it is drawn on the Nautical Chart of 1424!    From page 249 of Menzies’ book.  

 

 

 

What the  four islands drawn  on the Nautical Chart of 1424  are, are  the  islands of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia  and Prince Edward, on the Canadian Maritime Provinces. 

 

 

 

 

 

For you to see the entire monograph of this original discovery go to 
The True Antilles: Newfound land and Nova Scotia

 

The area size differences of all these islands compared with Portugal: 

Puerto Rico is TEN times smaller than Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. And Guadeloupe?  There is no comparison… 

Zuane Pizzigano drew the islands of Satanazes and Antilia on his Nautical Chart  of 1424, much larger than any of the Azorean or Madeira islands. He drew them to almost the size of Continental Portugal, not as small  islands as Puerto Rico or Guadeloupe. Zuane Pizzigano had information that  these island were gigantic islands compared  with the other islands known  to exist in the Atlantic at that time of 1424.  

Unfortunately Menzies did not pay any attention to this detail of the difference of the areas.  He did not notice  either the importance of so many deep bays, nor to the angles of inclination, drawn on the islands of the Nautical Chart!   What a pity! 

Newport Tower and Dighton Rock

Mr. Gavin Menzies makes  many unreliable statements in his book  such as: the Chinese knew how to measure  the longitude, they knew how desalinize the sea water, they had a fleet of 28,000 men, and their ships  called "junks" were 500 feet long and 180 wide which  could resist typhoons or hurricanes!... They discovered the entire world in less than two years!!!

He says that the commanders of the Chinese fleet were all eunuchs!

 The treacherous oceans always demand sailors with big and black testicles, not castrated individuals.

Mr. Menzies book is not a book of maritime history. It is a poor fictional novel with many incorrect historical facts.

I am just going to give two more examples revealing his incompetence in historical research.

He dedicates the entire 13th chapter of his book --  “Settlement in North America”--  saying that the Chinese navigators came directly  from  Puerto Rico in the Caribbean,  to the Narragansett Bay, in Rhode Island, and built the  octagonal Newport Tower and made the inscription on the face of Dighton Rock.  Like Speedy Gonzales! 

He forgot to state in his book that there are no octagonal structures in China. 

How could he affirm that the Chinese made the inscriptions of the face of Dighton Rock if he never examined the Dighton Rock in loco, and he does not know archeological epigraphy!  There are no Chinese hieroglyphical markings on the face of Dighton Rock.

Portugal has tens of octagonal church towers, and built tens  of octagonal church towers  in Brazil and Africa. 

We should pay particular attention to the main altar in Castle of Tomar,  in the Central of Portugal, which became the headquarters of the Cross of the Order of Christ of which Prince Henry the Navigator was the Grandmaster, and it was from this Order  that  all the moneys came from to build the Caravels with which  the Portuguese discovered two thirds of the world.

 

 

On left is the Charola or main altar in the Convent of Tomar, octagonal with 8 arches. On the right is the Newport Tower, octagonal with 8 arches. 

 

To see articles explaining in the detail the Portuguese Theory for the Newport Tower go to The Portuguese Tower of Newport, Chapter nine of  the book Portuguese Pilgrims and Dighton Rock.

 

 

 

Dighton Rock Inscriptions

Since 1918 the  Portuguese theory has been assigned to the inscriptions of Dighton Rock, engraved  by Miguel Corte Real,  in 1511. For 85 years, no archeologist-epigraphist has refuted the Portuguese theory.

 

Dighton Rock when it was located on the left bank of the Taunton River, in 1959, with the Portuguese inscriptions traced with chalk, for didactic purposes.

This photo shows the conclusion of the original inscriptions. To see the entire historical research  of  Dighton Rock, please,  go to  book “Portuguese Pilgrims and Dighton Rock “

 

 

Now compare this  color photograph by National geographic Magazine, Volume 147, No. 1, page 98, 1975. with the black and white photo (above) 

Flag # 1 à Portuguese Coat of Arms U shaped

Flag # 2 à Portuguese Cross of  the Order of Christ

Flag # 3 à Portuguese Coat of  Arms V shaped

Captain’s name : Miguel Corte Real

Date 1511 with 5 like a capital S

 

 

 

The Chinese Chickens

Chinese chicken, Menzies’, page 125

What came first? The chicken or the egg?   Mr. Gavin Menzies, says on page  123 of his book,  that one morning during a visit to Peru, “as he was laying in bed,  he heard the morning call of an Asiatic chicken –‘kik-kiri-kee’ –which is markedly different from the ‘cock-a-doodle-do’  of their European counterparts”.  This chicken melody…  was enough for him to think that those birds must  be  Chinese chickens  brought to Peru  by the  Chinese fleet  in 1421.  Wow!  Is this historical research or what? 

I have been a member of the New England Antiquities Research Association, (NEARA) http://www.neara.org/ , practically since its  foundation, 40 years ago.  We have several of our members in NEARA  that have already presented important papers concerning Chinese evidence  in the Americas but not related to any Chinese huge fleet of 1421.  Professor George Carter of the University of Texas AM University, archaeologist and professor of geography, was the first to reveal the Chinese connection of the chickens  in South America.  But he relates this event to the voyages of the Polynesian people crossing  the Pacific Ocean in sailing rafts, as demonstrated and confirmed by the late Thor Heyerdahl. 

Mr. Menzies’ book is loaded with much scant  and false documentation to the point that he already is being bombarded with  much negative criticism,  not only from  America but  even from the scholars and historians in Beijing China,   where they do not believe his theory at all!   

As for his defense he says that he wrote his book 'to stimulate more research in the discovery of America!'   Why didn’t he give the title of his book the discovery of Peru or Ecuador?  He gave it the name “The  Discovery of America” because he and his publishing company want to get more  dollars!  It seems that everybody is talking bad about America,  but they all want to come here to exploit  from the Americans more dollars! Amazing! 

Return