The Vikings never had
anything to do with Dighton Rock
!
By Manuel Luciano da Silva, Medical Doctor
March 2nd, 2005

When we talk about the Vikings or Norse People we are speaking of  the inhabitants that lived on the territories occupied by  the modern Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Finland is not part  of  the Vikings.

A map showing where the Vikings came from and where they settled in Britain.

The Viking Age started around the 8th century and lasted about 300  hundred years. It is believed the Vikings are originated from the Celtic people. They were mostly farmers but some worked as cratfsmen and traders. They built longships and some became fierce pirates. They  established Viking settlements in the lands that today are England . Their historical achievements are revealed in the so called “Viking Sagas” which is a collection of true facts and also fantasy.

Some historians and specially the descendents of the Vikings in North  America believe the Vikings discovered North America in the year of  1000 AD --  500 years before Cristovão Colon,  known also  as Columbus — arrived in Central America . 

I am going to show you, in a simple away, why the Vikings NEVER HAD anything to do with Dighton Rock inscriptions. 

Anyone can come up with a theory for the  Dighton Rock inscriptions. However if there are NO inscriptions engraved on the face of  Dighton Rock to TESTIFY  for your theory, you have NO theory at all.  You have to show  EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE  that the rock HAS  engravings demonstrating   the symbols or letters that comprise your  theory, otherwise you have nothing!  Scientifically, it is as simple as that! 

The Viking theory for Dighton Rock inscriptions.

The Viking or Norse  theory of Dighton Rock appeared for the first time in  1837. It was advanced  by Christian Rafn, a Danish scholar, who NEVER  visited Dighton Rock . From Copenhagen, MORE THAN THREE THOUSAND MILES AWAY,  he based his analysis on a drawing  he received, in 1835,  from the Rhode Island Historical Society, from Providence, Rhode lsland, U. S. A.

Together with his assistant, Finn Magnusen, they read into the markings a message related to a  name mentioned in the “ Vinking Sagas”. This  character was Thorfinn Karlsefni. But they made a BOOBOO  in their interpretation. They ADDED  to  the center of the inscriptions the  capital letters FIN  to coincide  with the name Thorfinn.  THIS WAS A NO NO,   AN ACT OF  HISTORICAL FRAUD!

There are NO  national symbols from any of the three Viking countries engraved on the face of Dighton Rock .

(1)   If the Vikings used the Runic alphabet there is  NOT a single letter of  this alphabet engraved on the face of Dighton Rock .

Here is the Runic  alphabet: Danish Futhark

Swedish-Norwegian/Short-twig/Rok Runes

Swedish-Norwegian / Short-twig / Rök Runes

Norwegian Futhark

Norwegian Futhark

(2)   From  the national flags of the three Viking counties – Denmark,  Norway , and   Sweden  – there is NOT a  single branch of any of their crosses engraved on the face of the Dighton Rock .  All these flags have the branches  of their crosses  ending  in straight lines.  NONE  of the  extremities of their crosses  terminate  in 45 degrees angles,  like the Portuguese Cross of the Order of Christ,  which is  engraved CLEARLY  on the face of the face of Dighton Rock .   

Here are the national flags of the  Denmark,  Norway, and  Sweden:

Denmark Norway Sweden

                                      

Compare the shape of the extremities of these crosses  with  the photo below  with the Portuguese national  symbols -- the Portuguese Coat of Arms and the Portuguese Cross of the Order of Christ --  and the inscriptions engraved on the face of the Dighton Rock:

Section of Dighton Rock with Portuguese national symbols:

 

Face of  Dighton Rock with the Portuguese Coat of Arms “V” shaped

and the Cross of the Order of Christ with extremities terminating in 45 degree angles. 

The water currents and the winds

Unfortunately, many so called “historians” continue to write about world discoveries, without analyzing thoroughly the two MAJOR FORCES which move the sailing ships at sea: the water currents and the winds.    This is the same as studying the outer space explorations without analyzing FIRST the rock fuel and the capsules…

If we want to study the Viking voyages, one thousand years ago,  we have to analyze  FIRST the water currents and the winds of the EXTREME  north of the Atlantic .

The water currents of the Atlantic are today the same as they have been for millions of years!  On the  North Atlantic , the DOMINANT currents of water and winds are CLOCKWISE.  On the southern  Atlantic the DOMINANT  currents are COUNTER CLOCKWISE. 

On the North  Atlantic the dominant current is the Gulf Stream, -- warm water --   which runs FROM  America TO  Europe. This is the strongest oceanic current in the world. 

 

 

It is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY  to understand the  DOMINANT water currents and winds of the Atlantic  BEFORE   writing about the  sea navigations 

 

 

But, in the EXTREME  North Atlantic, there is a current which  runs FROM  Europe TO  America: THE GREENLAND CURRENT.  It is a current of COLD water. It is much weaker than the  Gulf Stream . This is the current that brought the Vikings to America. 

Map of the Greenland current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same laboratory conditions:

Today we still have the same laboratory conditions in the EXTREME   north of the Atlantic as they existed over one thousand years ago, or millions of years ago. So if we have the same water currents and the same winds, what we have to do is built a ship equal to a Viking ship with the same SQUARE  sail and observe scientifically  what  will happen to this sail ship at sea. To which direction will  it go,  moved by the water and winds currents of the Greenland current?  There is only one way: to EXTREME  north America, which is the north of Newfoundland and Labrador Peninsula .  That is all!  

 

    

Viking ship WITHOUT  triangular sails or lateen sails

      The Viking ship CANNOT navigate lower than 50 degrees of latitude north,  against the strong Gulf Stream . It is impossible for any Viking ship to sail – against the strong winds of the Gulf Stream . The only sail that can navigate against the wind, or tacking  against the wind, or zigzag against the wind, is a ship with the TRIANGULAR, or  LATEEN  sail, which the Vikings did NOT  possess. The Portuguese were the first Europeans to use the triangular sail to navigate the high seas.  

Portuguese caravel with lateen sails:

 

 

 

 

      The typical Portuguese caravel with three triangular or lateen sails. This is the UNIQUE sail boat that can navigate against the wind. It does not need oars to be maneuvered. The lateen sails will do it. Note the hull borders higher from the sea level.

    How does a sailboat move against the wind or upwind?

The shape of the boat and the height of the hull of a boat are very important factors that have allowed sail boats the ability of sailing against the wind or sailing  upwind.

In the early years of sailing ships -- like the Viking ships--  the European ships had a square sail design. This design ONLY allowed for sailing with a favorable wind (before the wind). The Portuguese navigators were the first Europeans to venture into the high seas with the triangular or lateen sail,  to sail against wind.  “The triangular sail allowed  the navigation using a half  wind  (wind at 90 degrees to the  hull of the boat) which further increased the ship’s maneuvering ability – particularly in port , where ships previously were “dead in the water” without favorable wind.” 

The sail boats use the triangular sails fore and aft of the mainsails for the purpose of navigating out to sea to catch favorable trade winds for the square sails to be utilized.  

When the sail boat needs to navigate against the wind  it sets its triangular sail with the wind at 90 degrees to the hull of the  boat and this way makes  zigzags against the wind.  The boat will navigates in an arch,  but moves  forwardly.  The square sail CAN NOT DO THIS, like the Viking ships.

LAnse aux Meadows, Viking colony

The Viking Sagas describe that Leif Eriksson, around the year of 1000 AD, on a return trip from Greenland to Scandinavia, was caught  in a storm of the Greenland  current  which forced his boat to move WESTERELY   and he had no alternative but  to end in the EXTREME   north America.  This maritime episode is confirmed by the archaeological evidence founded in  the northernmost peninsula of Newfoundland at L’Anse aux Meadows, Canada.  The archaeological evidence found at  this place in 1962  has been confirmed by Carbon 14 dating of charcoal from the hearth which indicate a date of  plus or minus 900 AD. 

We accept this evidence that the Vikings came to EXTREME   north America , at L’Anse aux Meadows, in the year of 1000 AD. But we REFUTE, VEHEMENTLY, any reference that the Vikings were able to sail BELOW the latitude 50 degrees north. With their square sail they could NOT ever navigate against the Gulf Steam, and therefore they could NOT ever reach the Narragansett Bay, in Rhode  Island.

Any one who says that the Vikings built the Newport Tower in  City of Newport, and that they engraved the Dighton Rock inscriptions, is simply naïve, foolish, and  bias  and does not  know anything about the science of sea navigation.

Credit where credit is due. The Vikings deserve the L’Anse aux Meadows. But the Vikings had nothing to do with the inscriptions engraved  on the face of Dighton Rock.  It is about time the so called Nordists  have the guts to admit that there is NOTHING for them at these two American monuments: Newport Tower and  Dighton Rock.

Panel inside the Museum: 

Inside of the Dighton Rock Museum there is a display of  panels dedicated to the Viking theory, with Rafn’s explanation.  Many people who visit the museum have remarked: “Why have such nonsense and fraudulent theory inside of the museum?” My answer to them is:  “So everyone will be able to make the DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS of different theories.  This way it proves we are not hiding anything from the general public. The Museum respects everyone’s intelligence. It is for each visitor to choose what he or she feels is the correct diagnosis”.

The Norse Myth

Professor Edmund Delabarre, who investigated the inscriptions for more than 30 years,  and who had  a house one mile from the rock, said on his book entitled “Dighton Rock” ( published in 1928, by Walter Neale, New York), on  page 86:

“The Norse controversy that once raged fiercely about Dighton Rock can now (1928) be regarded as a closed chapter.  Everyone whose opinion has any weight agree today (1928) that these hardy rovers left behind them no relics that have endured and that the Dighton Rock, the skeleton with brass armor found near Fall River, and the old stone Tower in Newport, had no connection to them (Vikings)”.

Despite this affirmation, more than three quarters of a century ago,  by Prof. Delabarre, who had not a single drop of  Portuguese blood  in his veins, the Nordists continue to write and speak at various historical  and archaeological meetings,   insisting that their Viking ancestors   did it.   They do the same with the Vinland Map, even though all the super modern tests have  verified  that such a map is forgery. When are the Nordists going to stop being ridiculous?

Return